New Sherwood

On not judging others

I don’t think it’s necessarily wrong for a pope to use harsh and judgmental language when appropriate. Some of our popes did, at times, use excoriating language and even insults against the enemies of God, as did Our Lord Himself. All to the good. It’s a matter of prudence and, of course, truth. It’s very important that insults be properly directed and oriented toward the ultimate good of all. They should also be used sparingly.

But we are not accustomed to popes speaking so harshly in this Age of Tolerance and Non-Judgmentalism! I don’t remember John Paul II or Benedict XVI using harsh or insulting language, even when it came to the enemies of the Faith. However, Pope Francis has already developed quite a reputation for insulting those with whom he disagrees, to the point where The Pope Francis Little Book of Insults needs daily updating.

This morning’s homily is a prime example:

Christians who are allergic to preachers always have a reason to criticise but the truth is that they are afraid to open up to the Holy Spirit. And this is how they become sad, Pope Francis said at this morning’s mass in St. Martha’s House, Vatican Radio reports.

In the Gospel passage chosen as today’s reading, Jesus “compares the generation of his time to those children who are always unhappy, who do not know how to play happily, who always refuse the invitation of others: if they play, they do not dance, and if they sing its a song of lament, they do not cry … nothing satisfies them.” Pope Francis explained that those people “were not open to the Word of God.” They refuse “the messenger, not the message.” They reject John the Baptist, who “neither eats nor drink,” saying he is “a man possessed”. They reject Jesus because they say he “it is a glutton, a drunkard, a friend of publicans and sinners.” 

They always have a reason to criticize the preacher: “The people of that time preferred to take refuge in a more elaborate religion: in the moral precepts, such as the group of Pharisees; in political compromise, as the Sadducees; in social revolution, as the zealots; in agnostic spirituality, such as Essenes. They were [happy] with their clean, well-polished system. The preacher, however, was not [so pleased]. Jesus reminded them: ‘Your fathers did the same with the prophets.’ The people of God have a certain allergy to the preachers of the Word: they persecuted the prophets, [even] killed them.”

“These people claimed to accept the truth of revelation, “but the preacher, preaching, no. They prefer a life caged in their precepts, in their compromises, in their revolutionary plans or in their [disembodied] spirituality,” Francis said.

“These Christians are closed, they are trapped, sad … these Christians are not free,” Francis said. “Why? Because they are afraid of the freedom of the Holy Spirit, which comes through preaching. This, then, is the scandal of preaching, of which St. Paul spoke: the scandal of preaching that ends in the scandal of the Cross. That God should speak to us through men with limits, sinful men, scandalizes: and what scandalizes even more is that that God should speak to us and save us by way of a man who says he is the Son of God but ends [his life] as a criminal. That scandalizes.”

“These sad Christians,” Pope Francis said, “do not believe in the Holy Spirit, do not believe in the freedom that comes from preaching, which admonishes you, teaches you – slaps you, as well – but it is the very freedom that makes the Church grow.”

“Seeing these children who are afraid to dance, to cry, [who are] afraid of everything, who ask for certainty in all things, I think of these sad Christians, who always criticize the preachers of the Truth, because they are afraid to open the door to the Holy Spirit. Francis concluded the mass by inviting those present to pray “for them, and pray also for ourselves, that we do not become sad Christians, cutting off the freedom of the Holy Spirit to come to us through the scandal of preaching.”

Now then, don’t you feel inspired?

Advertisements

December 14, 2013 - Posted by | Pope Francis

7 Comments »

  1. I’m sorry, I’m having trouble understanding precisely what he means. I assume you’re being tongue in cheek about feeling inspired.

    Like

    Comment by William Luse | December 14, 2013 | Reply

    • I thought it was just me. But if someone of your caliber is having the same difficulty, I feel much better now.

      Like

      Comment by c matt | January 8, 2014 | Reply

  2. As, I believe, S. Armaticus notes, our pope sure sounds like a troll sometimes. A real trolly-roller, he is. He’s done this before, during the first season of Big Interviews. He not so subtly too potshots at those who would try to catch him in his words, just like the… wait for it… Pharisees. Or maybe it was the Pelagians. Or the Prometheans. I don’t know. Everything tends to melt into one ball of passive-aggression under the unblinking of this Dogmatically Joyful Pope. This latest fervorino has tipped my hand: I will begin a document titled “Franciscus contra Franciscum,” in which I array the pope’s contradictory oracles. Are those who don’t believe already judged or are atheists on the path to heaven? Is it deviant to cling to old phrases and customs from the past or are we bound to reverence Trent with equal fervor? And so on. More of the same from our Humpty Dumpty Pope. Words mean to him what he wants them to mean, depending on his “discernment” of the immediate “needs” of “the people” (i.e. A demagogue’s got to do what a demagogue’s got to do). And, like Humpty Dumpty, his vision is fractured into a thousand irreconcilable pieces. He scatters that we, the sheep, are forced to unify, the very antithesis of the papal duty.

    Like

    Comment by Codgitator (Cadgertator) | December 14, 2013 | Reply

  3. ERRATA: too –> took; unblinking EYE of…

    Like

    Comment by Codgitator (Cadgertator) | December 14, 2013 | Reply

  4. I don’t understand his ongoing (comparatively severe) criticism of people for what are essentially temperament / personality traits.

    Like

    Comment by Confused | December 15, 2013 | Reply

    • The negativism and negative behaviors to which the Pope refers are being compared to children, immature and undeveloped. Don’t confuse these behaviors with a personality type as that’s just one more excuse that modern psychology dupes the public with. Claiming it’s a personality type is rationalization and excuse making. We’re called to grow up and be focused outside of ourselves.

      These negative individuals have sadly lost their way because they focus only upon themselves instead of seeking the freedom and liberty of living in Christ as His Disciple. They’d rather sit in misery than experience the joy of that freedom. That’s not a personality type. That’s immaturity.

      Like

      Comment by MB | December 30, 2013 | Reply

  5. The SSPX responds in detail with “Joy of the Gospel – Grief for the Faithful”. “These constant reprimands are embarrassing.”

    Like

    Comment by Blogmaster | December 17, 2013 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: