For “Religious Freedom”, or the Reign of Christ?

Christopher Check has an insightful review of “For Greater Glory” at Crisis Magazine:

“The film somewhat overplays this religious-freedom angle.  Gorostieta’s wife, ably played by Eva Longoria, asks how he can fight for a cause in which he does not believe.  He replies that he believes in religious freedom.  Later he delivers to his troops the same kind of anachronistic speeches that mar Mel Gibson epics.  ‘Freedom is our lives!’ he declares, and at one point he proclaims that the Cristeros will not stop fighting until they have a democratically elected government.  Well, the fact is that democracy was doubtless part of the problem in early twentieth-century Mexico.  Indeed, as Rubén Blades, in one of the film’s stronger performances as Plutarco Calles, points out in a fictionalized meeting between the general and the president, the people of Mexico did vote him into office.

The religious freedom theme has served the marketers of the picture well given the growing number of Catholics reacting to the Obama Administration’s mandate that Catholic institutions offer contraceptive coverage for their employees.  The difficulty with making too much of religious freedom when telling the story of La Cristiada—as the Cristero War came to be called—is that the Cristeros in the field, surely to the man, were not fighting for religious freedom.  They were fighting for the political and social kingship of Jesus Christ.

Religious freedom can be a good, but it is not an absolute good, and the ‘absolute freedom’ that Garcia defends as General Gorostieta (and in media interviews as well) is problematic outside the context of Christianity.

It was the Catholic Faith, the Seven Sacraments, the Mass, Christ the King, and Our Lady of Guadalupe, for which the Cristeros took up arms.  Their battle cry was ‘¡Viva Cristo Rey!’ or ‘Long live Christ the King,’ not ‘Religious Freedom for all!’  The martyrs in the Circus of Nero did not die for religious freedom, and neither did the Cristeros.”

At the conclusion of every low Mass in the Extraordinary Form, the priest and people pray specifically “for the liberty and exaltation of Holy Mother Church.” I therefore admit to using a form of mental reservation with respect to “religious freedom” and similar buzzwords: I simply add, silently, “for the Church”.

It isn’t that religious freedom for non-Catholics should be denied. Prudentially, religious freedom may be the best course at times, provided that a nation isn’t so radically pluralistic as to deny its government a religious orientation or legitimacy. But religious freedom is only a secondary good at best – a political compromise in which sins against the First Commandment are tolerated in order that obedience to the First Commandment may also be tolerated. Necessary, perhaps, but hardly an absolute principle worth fighting and dying for.

One thought on “For “Religious Freedom”, or the Reign of Christ?

  1. Todos los amigos católicos mexicanos, en el nombre de Cristo Rey, por favor no vote por Obama. Obama es un enemigo católico. Obama a menudo ha profanado y contaminado nuestra santa fe. Por favor, no votes, o el apoyo a este hombre.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s