New Sherwood

Holy Communion, Jansenism, and Scruples

There is nothing greater on this poor earth. To receive the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ – and with Him all the graces that God can bestow upon the soul – is the most sublime and significant thing one can do in this life.

Such a magnificent gift is not to be trifled with.

All Catholics know that one should not receive the Eucharist when in a state of mortal sin. But many a Catholic would not know a mortal sin if it bit him on the arse. This is not a new problem. Saint Teresa of Avila, in her autobiography, describes some of her earliest priest-confessors who were themselves confused on the point and led her astray:

“What was venial they said was no sin at all, and what was serious mortal sin they said was venial. This did me so much harm that it should not surprise anyone that I speak of it here in order to warn others against so great an evil.”

Due to my own capacity for self-deception, I myself am not always sure about this, despite the clear teaching of the Church.

This occasional uncertainty, along with the weight of the sheer accumulation of venial sins, induces me to hold myself back from holy communion from time to time. Some have told me that this practice is “Jansenistic” and scrupulous. Perhaps there is a taint of scrupulosity in my personality, and perhaps not: that really isn’t the point. It just seems to me that the Holy Eucharist is important enough to prepare oneself well, and when one hasn’t prepared himself well, refraining from communion can provide the incentive and devotion needed to prepare for the next opportunity.

The Catholic Church, of course, does not require weekly reception of Holy Communion, but encourages it for those who are well prepared. Receiving Our Lord with indifference, distraction, lukewarmness and moral uncertainty – as I am so often inclined to do – does not strike me as being well prepared. That said, I expect that most of my neighbors are usually better prepared than I am, or at least have better internal assurances, and I would advise any Catholic with a properly formed conscience – including my own children – to receive communion whenever in doubt, with the intention of going to confession during the week.

I am reassured by the fact that the writer at Dust of the Time observes a similar devotional rule. She writes:

“On some occasions, I personally choose to stay behind and not receive the precious Body and Blood of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist. Perhaps too many venial sins have piled up and I haven’t yet confessed my sins to the priest, or perhaps I have been inattentive and not prepared myself well for Holy Communion.”

“I believe denying oneself Holy Communion once in a while is useful not only for our own souls, but also serves as an example to others who may feel they are obligated to receive Holy Communion simply because they attend Mass.”

As for the charge of Jansenism, the practice of refraining from communion for devotional reasons long predates this heresy. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, which in retrospect seems to promote very frequent communion rather incautiously, the frequency of reception declined precisely as Faith was on the ascendancy:

“The Poor Clares, by rule, communicated six times a year; the Dominicanesses, fifteen times; the Third Order of St. Dominic, four times. Even saints received rarely: St. Louis six times a year, St. Elizabeth only three times.”

At a time when scrupulosity was a widespread problem, it made sense to promote frequent communion. But we live in different times: today the problem is presumption, not scrupulosity, and the greater danger is sacrilege.

I don’t want the Church to abandon the ideal of frequent communion, but let’s remove the stigma from not receiving. There are many reasons not to receive: not having confessed one’s mortal sins (or uncertainty about the same), not having fasted properly, not having recollected oneself, arriving late for Mass, etc. One should have a good confessor to help determine whether scrupulosity is an issue. All should try to receive weekly by preparing themselves well, beginning, if possible, on Saturday night. The preparation need not be perfect, of course. And it is good to remember that reception of the Eucharist bestows the forgiveness of venial sins. But let’s also remember that, for some, abstaining from holy communion on occasion is helpful in maintaining a proper reverence and respect for the Sacrament, so that the Eucharist is received more worthily and lovingly in the future.

Advertisements

May 14, 2008 - Posted by | Uncategorized

6 Comments »

  1. I very much disagree with ever making a point of abstaining from the Eucharist even though one is not in mortal sin. You’re disregarding THE GREAT DESIRE OF JESUS HIMSELF to come to you. We may, and should, have every confidence that He has this desire, towards every soul that is free of mortal sin. None of your own personal reasons why it “might” be good to abstain could possibly outweigh the Lord’s own desire that you receive, that you have confidence in His mercy, that you welcome His grace, that you be ever more deeply united with Himself.

    Like

    Comment by Elizabeth | March 15, 2009 | Reply

  2. I thought that we partake of the cup, the blood, “for the forgiveness of sins.” Didn’t Jesus say, this is my blood, drink this for the forgiveness of sins. Blood washes away impurities in the body. Christ’s blood takes away sin from his body, the church. We should drink, fully intending to put away sin and lead a new life.

    Bill

    Like

    Comment by Bill | December 16, 2011 | Reply

  3. You are correct! But the priests are so scared of talking about mortal sin or even intimating that one should actually prepare for communion. We are so scared about what other people think and don’t understand that sacrilage is a horrible offense. I accept our lord once a month only after confession. It has done a world of good for me. Peace be upon you!

    Like

    Comment by Sean | May 10, 2013 | Reply

  4. Reblogged this on New Sherwood.

    Like

    Comment by Blogmaster | January 8, 2014 | Reply

  5. Jeff:
    All Catholics know that one should not receive the Eucharist when in a state of mortal sin.

    Believe it or not, I did not know that until I was in my thirties. And I went to parochial school. Don’t underestimate the power of our culture to inculcate vincible ignorance.

    Like

    Comment by Zippy | January 8, 2014 | Reply

  6. Good point, Zippy. And Happy New Year.

    Like

    Comment by Blogmaster | January 9, 2014 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: